<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Creating our AJAX photo gallery</title>
	<atom:link href="http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/</link>
	<description>it and development at europe's leading clubbing community</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 06:46:06 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: techblog.tilllate.com &#187; Google is not enough-</title>
		<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/#comment-3462</link>
		<dc:creator>techblog.tilllate.com &#187; Google is not enough-</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:50:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/#comment-3462</guid>
		<description>[...] After we launched the new AJAX-Gallery it was clear that it was a big success. But are we able to measure this success? It shouldn&#8217;t be a big problem, we have several statistic tools to measure how many pages we deliver. For the Swiss part of tilllate we use WEMF NetMetrix to get official numbers, our own tool (&#8221;Prince analytics&#8221;) to answer some questions we can&#8217;t with other tools and at the end the Google Analytics to answer our daily questions. So as my co-worker Ciprian started to collect all this data he gets three different graphs. Not a bit different, very different. After some time we found out that we made a mistake with our own tool. This issue fixed WEMF and &#8220;Prince analytics&#8221; showed the same graph. But still, Google Analytics only show around half the numbers. The overall graph was correct, but the results of the drilldown on our gallery were wrong. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] After we launched the new AJAX-Gallery it was clear that it was a big success. But are we able to measure this success? It shouldn&#8217;t be a big problem, we have several statistic tools to measure how many pages we deliver. For the Swiss part of tilllate we use WEMF NetMetrix to get official numbers, our own tool (&#8221;Prince analytics&#8221;) to answer some questions we can&#8217;t with other tools and at the end the Google Analytics to answer our daily questions. So as my co-worker Ciprian started to collect all this data he gets three different graphs. Not a bit different, very different. After some time we found out that we made a mistake with our own tool. This issue fixed WEMF and &#8220;Prince analytics&#8221; showed the same graph. But still, Google Analytics only show around half the numbers. The overall graph was correct, but the results of the drilldown on our gallery were wrong. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Victor</title>
		<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/#comment-3166</link>
		<dc:creator>Victor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 18:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/#comment-3166</guid>
		<description>... ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; <img src='http://techblog.tilllate.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mix</title>
		<link>http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/#comment-3165</link>
		<dc:creator>mix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Nov 2007 08:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://techblog.tilllate.com/2007/10/31/creating-our-ajax-photo-gallery/#comment-3165</guid>
		<description>Alles schön und gut, jedoch ist die Galerie mit deaktiviertem Javascript nichts wert. Ich bin mir allerdings sicher, dass dies ohne Probleme möglich gewesen wäre..</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alles schön und gut, jedoch ist die Galerie mit deaktiviertem Javascript nichts wert. Ich bin mir allerdings sicher, dass dies ohne Probleme möglich gewesen wäre..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
