Comments on: Webtuesday Lightning Talk Slides

By: Stefan Koelle

Stefan Koelle — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:32:12 +0000

Finally the first Implementation…
http://blog.aztec-project.org/2009/07/13/stupiddb-object-persistence-framework/

By: build broken » StupidDB – object-persistence-framework

build broken » StupidDB – object-persistence-framework — Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:30:36 +0000

[...] durch einen Blogeintrag von tilllate.com letztes Jahr, entstand bereits vor einem Jahr die erste Version von StupidDB, welches bis zum [...]

By: leo

leo — Wed, 20 Aug 2008 07:19:27 +0000

@gerard: Well, yes! StupidDB is just much more stupid. Because it’s in a local net no security is needed and because of the high latency of the local net you can save even smaller objects.

@stefan: It’s exactly what I did expect, sombody will implement it for me . BTW you got mail.

By: Stefan

Stefan — Tue, 19 Aug 2008 19:27:48 +0000

We’re just building our own StupidDB-alike Storage System.

I’m really interested in brainstorming with Leo, how can I contact him?

By: gerard

gerard — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 15:46:30 +0000

Hmmm, StupidDB sounds a *lot* like Amazon S3 (http://aws.amazon.com/s3). And the protocol is even HTTP.

By: leo

leo — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 07:20:45 +0000

Thanks for you’re input Robin. We had a talk about CouchDB a while ago at webtuesday, it’s a realy cool system. But CouchDB does not look mature enough for production for me and saving allways the old version wastes a lot of diskspace if you don’t need them.

By: Robin Mehner

Robin Mehner — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 12:35:31 +0000

Some of the concepts you’ve mentioned with “StupidDB” are in CouchDB (http://incubator.apache.org/couchdb/), it might be worth a look.

By: Sebs

Sebs — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 10:04:22 +0000

Damn, I MUST attend the next webtuesday … I MUST