Comments on: Clientside Cache Control http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/ it and development at europe's leading clubbing community Mon, 09 Aug 2010 07:13:54 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Gomer http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-33330 Gomer Thu, 02 Apr 2009 20:25:16 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-33330 Cache in FF really sucks! Why the hell safari does so well? Cache in FF really sucks! Why the hell safari does so well?

]]> By: Eric Bence http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-26399 Eric Bence Sun, 11 Jan 2009 18:40:27 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-26399 I personally find firefox to be the most effective website with the smallest cache. Also as stated before you can do a force full refresh by holding down shift and clicking refresh. I personally find firefox to be the most effective website with the smallest cache. Also as stated before you can do a force full refresh by holding down shift and clicking refresh.

]]> By: Clientside Cache Control - Webboarder http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-22558 Clientside Cache Control - Webboarder Thu, 27 Nov 2008 17:01:52 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-22558 [...] techblog.tilllate.com gab es vor kurzer Zeit einen recht interessanten Ansatz zur Cache-Kontrolle durch den User. Dieses ist eine deutsche Erklärung dazu, die noch einen kleinen Schritt weiter [...] [...] techblog.tilllate.com gab es vor kurzer Zeit einen recht interessanten Ansatz zur Cache-Kontrolle durch den User. Dieses ist eine deutsche Erklärung dazu, die noch einen kleinen Schritt weiter [...]

]]> By: Acai http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-22431 Acai Wed, 26 Nov 2008 07:41:37 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-22431 Man, we're still dealing with browser wars...what a joke. I would be ok with it if everyone adhered to the W3C protocol and then added bells and whistles to make their browser 'better', but designing for multiple forms is crazy. Man, we’re still dealing with browser wars…what a joke. I would be ok with it if everyone adhered to the W3C protocol and then added bells and whistles to make their browser ‘better’, but designing for multiple forms is crazy.

]]> By: Jiayong Ou http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-21359 Jiayong Ou Mon, 17 Nov 2008 18:33:29 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-21359 cool how you censor your home directory but not the Host header ;-) cool how you censor your home directory but not the Host header ;-)

]]> By: sergio http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-21343 sergio Mon, 17 Nov 2008 16:08:13 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-21343 You can check your client headers at: <a href="http://requestheaders.com/" rel="nofollow">view request headers</a> You can check your client headers at: view request headers

]]> By: leo http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-21274 leo Mon, 17 Nov 2008 08:04:29 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-21274 @Martin F.: I completly agree on this. But if you use Memcache for caching you have alot of different values and it's hard to comunicate this to the user. @Micah & Bryan: Yes, I tried it on FF3. Both methods force FF to send ‘Cache-Control’ and ‘Pragma’ with no-cache. @Martin F.: I completly agree on this. But if you use Memcache for caching you have alot of different values and it’s hard to comunicate this to the user.
@Micah & Bryan: Yes, I tried it on FF3. Both methods force FF to send ‘Cache-Control’ and ‘Pragma’ with no-cache.

]]> By: Bryan Migliorisi http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-21160 Bryan Migliorisi Sun, 16 Nov 2008 17:23:26 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-21160 For FireFox, you can also force a full refresh by holding down shift and clicking on the refresh button. For FireFox, you can also force a full refresh by holding down shift and clicking on the refresh button.

]]> By: Micah http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-20805 Micah Fri, 14 Nov 2008 22:53:57 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-20805 I believe FF2 and FF3 also use Ctlr+Shift+r to bust the cache. I believe FF2 and FF3 also use Ctlr+Shift+r to bust the cache.

]]> By: Martin F http://techblog.tilllate.com/2008/11/14/clientside-cache-control/comment-page-1/#comment-20749 Martin F Fri, 14 Nov 2008 17:19:28 +0000 http://techblog.tilllate.com/?p=408#comment-20749 Personally I simply notify users when some of their submitted content is not shown yet due to caching, I've yet to hear any complaints, same goes for downtime, so long as they know why things are happening the way they are they're usually OK with it. Feedback to your users can save you lots of complicated work. ;) Personally I simply notify users when some of their submitted content is not shown yet due to caching, I’ve yet to hear any complaints, same goes for downtime, so long as they know why things are happening the way they are they’re usually OK with it.

Feedback to your users can save you lots of complicated work. ;)

]]>